Submitted by peptalks93 t3_z8esly in personalfinance
JonathanKuminga t1_iybdami wrote
Reply to comment by virtualchoirboy in Job offer and counter-offer by peptalks93
Except don’t point that out, don’t burn the bridge. Leave on good terms. They’ll already know.
HuckleberryRound4672 t1_iybdrm5 wrote
Yeah, you have nothing to gain by pointing this out. They’ll know.
Dandan0005 t1_iybqz07 wrote
Yep. If they really need you they’ll offer more later.
It’s better to leave and boomerang back eventually than to accept a counteroffer.
Remarkable_Night2373 t1_iycrod4 wrote
The only time I ever went back it was after being gone for 6 months. We started talking after I was gone 3 months and I told them what would be perfect for me. They I guess kept looking for my replacement and then gave me what I wanted. I was with that for about a year before new ownership came in and wanted a different deal. I was given a severance and had an even better job within a week! It worked out for me but the only reason I went back is because I wanted hourly and the ability to work contract gigs on top of having their insurance and a reliable pay.
Ready-to-learn t1_iybjoiu wrote
100% this. No reason to burn that bridge.
Andrew5329 t1_iydzwdk wrote
Seriously, I can't believe that's the top comment.
Accepting the counter offer can sometimes make sense though. A friend of mine got a call from his previous employer offering him enough of a jump that it would be hard to turn down, but likes his new job better so he took the offer to them and they matched it. That was most of a year ago and they've been very good to him so far.
The degree to which different Employers/Roles actually care about retention varies, but those who do will go out of their way to placate people they think might be flight risks. The cost of awarding a small "market adjust" is smaller than letting the position go vacant.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments