uptown_gargoyle t1_j9jxb5j wrote
Reply to comment by Ng3me in Mayoral candidate Helen Gym and ex-Mayor Michael Nutter clashed during a live event: ‘We are just in total disagreement’ by thefirststoryteller
I think he shouldn't have let Gym dodge his question about her conflict of interest in voting against the pharma rep bill. If being perceived as aggressive is the only way of preventing a politician from dodging a perfectly reasonable, important question, then I think a responsible moderator needs to be aggressive.
Maybe Nutter could have held Gym accountable by some means other than apparent aggression. Something about catching flies with honey instead of vinegar. But, as a voter, it's much more important to me that they do it than how they do it.
ConfiaEnElProceso t1_j9kj6vp wrote
I mean, Alan Domb's entire campaign seems to be a conflict of interest and Nutter let him off way easier than Gym.
ADFC t1_j9lcf1y wrote
Except one of them answered how they’ll avoid conflict of interest and the other candidate dodged the question
ConfiaEnElProceso t1_j9lcqmo wrote
He said he would announce a plan. I didn't find that answer convincing.
Cadiz215 t1_j9z844m wrote
He actually did announce a plan though
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments