Submitted by Banglophile t3_118got1 in philadelphia
TiberiusDrexelus t1_j9h1jqh wrote
Why publish her name like this, when there's a psycho mob after her head?
Her actions could not have been more justified, and were restrained. The AR-15 of dogs was attempting to eat her little puppy, she did what anyone would do in her situation.
I hope she doesn't get harassed over this nonsense, pitbull apologists are crazily ruthless and vengeful
[deleted] t1_j9h24gn wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j9hc8gy wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9he5jp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j9hgadd wrote
[removed]
the_happy_atheist t1_j9haj98 wrote
So according to most people here I can just start shooting every little dog that attacks my dog. In a crowded area.
TiberiusDrexelus t1_j9hbhci wrote
That is quite literally what Pennsylvania law says, yes
How about don't have out of control violent monster dogs?
surferdude313 t1_j9hdt9x wrote
Great reading comprehension you get a gold star ⭐
bigassbiddy t1_j9hgq95 wrote
Yep! You have the right to defend yourself and your dog from aggressive, attacking dogs.
[deleted] t1_j9hbd10 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments