Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JohnnyZack t1_iy3bd25 wrote

OK, so here's the thing: Bus Rapid Transit doesn't inherently suck. It sucks because we usually do it badly and make it get stuck in traffic along portions of its route. The Boulevard is the PERFECT place for it to be done correctly, with its own right of way, signal priority, and generous stations akin to what you'd expect for a tram service. There's so much horizontal space available, high traffic speeds, etc. I would love to see rail instead some day, and we should contemplate that future when designing the BRT system. But we have limited funds for this sort of thing and we can get a good BRT done cheaply there. That plus an improved connection to the BSL would be so much more valuable than a shiny new rail project. (And you can imagine BRT connecting west as far as the Wiss Transit Center or continuing onto Route 1, which rail is not going to do any time soon.)

4

ConfiaEnElProceso t1_iy3ckxu wrote

I don't know. Where have you seen bus Rapid Transit that doesn't suck? All the models including this article point to Bogota Colombia as an example with their Transmilenio system. I lived in Columbia for 3 years and can tell you that it is absolutely awful especially when compared with an actual Metro in Medellin. This project already has the ridership to supporta subway.

2

JohnnyZack t1_iycn3ic wrote

I found the BRT line in Guadalajara, Mexico to be pretty great. And Pittsburgh has its issues but it mostly works. (Still too much potential for it to be held up by gridlock, poorly behaving drivers, etc., in my view. You've gotta clear and protect the whole route or it's just a bus.)

To be clear, I would absolutely support a rail project if the conversation were about, say, the state legislature significantly increasing funding for SEPTA and the various ways we might use that new infusion of cash. (I think the width of the boulevard still counsels in favor of something above ground, but there's no reason that can't be rail.) I'm making this argument in the context of (1) SEPTA's meager capital budget, and (2) the existential need to eliminate as many car miles as possible as quickly as possible.

1

ConfiaEnElProceso t1_iyct90u wrote

My understanding is that the rail proposal is being pushed now in part bc of the federal funds available in the infrastructure act. If the density is already there for rail it seems like a waste to settle for BRT.

1