ButtcoinSanta t1_j6sd5sb wrote
Reply to comment by EmuChance4523 in How to be a sceptic | We have an ethical responsibility to adopt a sceptical attitude to everything from philosophy and science to economics and history in the pursuit of a good life for ourselves and others. by IAI_Admin
Which definition of vaccine are you using for your 0/1 antivax take?
EmuChance4523 t1_j6sfd2a wrote
What definition of vaccine do you have that the antivax take is not bs?
If you take any scientific vaccine, this is the answer to the antivax take. It is reasonable to be antivax for example, when the vaccine proposed is the piss vaccine used by crazy cults, but the scientific ones don't have the flaws attacked by the antivax crazies.
This doesn't mean that our scientific methods, or that the process that we used to develop vaccines, or that there isn't corruption in our institutions that we need to fix, but the problems aren't related to what the antivax cults cry.
VitriolicViolet t1_j6v9ii1 wrote
the current modern ones?
the anti-vax movement either focus on A) new shit like the COVID vaccine (its beyond apparent at this stage that its safe) or B) old-ass mercury containing vaccines from the 1930s.
which 'definition' are you using?
i oppose mandatory vaccination on the grounds of inalienable right to bodily autonomy, not some completely inaccurate nonsense about their safety.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments