Submitted by Necessary_Tadpole692 t3_10x97jk in philosophy
SnapcasterWizard t1_j7vif6w wrote
Reply to comment by Chance-Conclusion-43 in Judith Butler: their philosophy of gender explained by Necessary_Tadpole692
>One, that makes no sense. Sex is a classification because it is part of material, empirical reality.
You are fighting a losing war here. Bulter is a post modernist, they don't just disagree with your conclusions, they disagree with the entirety of how you got there. To a post modernist the statement,
" it is part of material, empirical reality."
Is already were they are disagreeing with you. Material, empirical reality either does not exist or is impossible to discover according to them.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments