Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mojoegojoe t1_j9hk2fl wrote

Reply to comment by Dumas_Vuk in Often mischaracterized as a rather debaucherous, hedonistic philosophy, Epicureanism actually focuses on the removal of pain and anxiety from our lives, and champions a calm ‘philosophy as therapy’ approach in pursuit of life’s highest pleasure: mental tranquility. by philosophybreak

Possible through QM with GR no?

3

Socile t1_j9i33sd wrote

How? Neither describes anything but deterministic or probabilistic physics.

2

mojoegojoe t1_j9i4ecb wrote

But if QM is interfered with external to the universal set its non-deterministic [big if]

2

Socile t1_j9i5524 wrote

How would that happen?

2

mojoegojoe t1_j9i7lnr wrote

Within plank definition

2

Socile t1_j9i9tpn wrote

Sorry, you lost me.

3

mojoegojoe t1_j9icu2a wrote

Take a snoop at this. https://youtu.be/_Y8HgmOoLCM

2

Socile t1_j9n1nk6 wrote

This doesn’t say anything about free will. Are you trying to surmise that there are free-will-endowing agents at scales smaller than we can currently examine?

1

mojoegojoe t1_j9n5dk3 wrote

Not necessarily, just that that's the interface at which they would act iif that were the case. But by definition its not what we can currently examine - it's what our model of physics defines elementary by the energy mass defintion.

1

QiPowerIsTheBest t1_j9kvsdb wrote

I wouldn’t think so. QM is probabilistic but things don’t randomly swerve like in Epicurean physics.

2

mojoegojoe t1_j9l8hi3 wrote

Right but the probability is based on the observer structure within the universal set, which could mean 'observation' within the probably include variances outside the universal set by some nonenergy defined process

1