Submitted by Otarih t3_11b25kv in philosophy
oramirite t1_j9yjjlt wrote
Reply to comment by ibringthehotpockets in The Job Market Apocalypse: We Must Democratize AI Now! by Otarih
But "to me" isn't the test. Hundreds of other people made the spot that you didn't.
ibringthehotpockets t1_j9zbk7y wrote
I would say a majority of people did pass it. Based on the comments, which are certainly more biased towards spotting it (they’re also going to be self-selecting educated/readers). At least at the time of posting my previous comment, there were many upvotes comments discussing it as if it were real. There’s certainly more rigorous tests that should bf done obviously, but even getting a 50% result posting to a philosophy board would probably make you think that posting it to the populace could only increase that number.
If 90% of people pass it and 10% doesn’t, does it pass lol? I mean I would think yes, I don’t see why not.
oramirite t1_j9zcoan wrote
Give me a break, eye-scanning a reddit thread for rough percentages is NEEEEEVWR going to be a scientifically sound sampling method. You'd have do actually do the test according to the actual specifications of the test. Anything else you wanna try to bend into being the test .... isn't.
What is being marketed and developed as "AI" is garbage, and we should all rally against it as being a solution for a problem that doesn't exist.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments