Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

jamesj t1_jbgsbr5 wrote

This is puzzling if you think natural selection acts on the level of organisms, but completely explained (along with other altruistically motivated actions) I'd you think that natural selection acts on the level of genes (selfish gene theory).

6

frnzprf t1_jbivmg9 wrote

It's also evolutionary beneficial if people influence each other by communicating and so the personal morality of a human can be influenced socially, which is indirectly evolutionary.

Human babies are relatively uncapable in comparison to other animals and they learn important skills by copying. It's like IKEA furniture that is easier to produce and ship, because there is still some assembly required.

1

[deleted] t1_jbjrs5b wrote

>I'd you think that natural selection acts on the level of genes (selfish gene theory).

Yes but just about any human action can be argued to have evolutionary benefit, so we can't use this as a feature or a marker of ethical progress.

1