Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Double_Joseph t1_iqqou8l wrote

That is simply not true though. Life thrives in certain areas more then others. This would make it possible to have a utopia. Has nothing to do with perception.

−5

MyNameIsNonYaBizniz t1_iqqt1dv wrote

You do understand the definition of Utopia, right?

5

Drwfyytrre t1_irlf8tv wrote

Don’t be pedantic

1

MyNameIsNonYaBizniz t1_irlji2y wrote

Lol, really? You wanna redefine Utopia because its official definition is too "pedantic" for you?

1

Drwfyytrre t1_irv5hd2 wrote

Obviously a perfect world is impossible, everyone that talks of Utopia knows that, but a greater world isn’t, which is that dudes point. Perfect is the enemy of the good. Crime will never go out completely in a world with billions, but it can be reduced to a rarity

1

Double_Joseph t1_iqrrwp0 wrote

Yeah and it can still be possible. The universe is ever expanding and massive.

0

Searbh t1_iqqwuos wrote

But the idea of a perfect society is what is impossible in an objective sense since the criteria for perfection varies from person to person.

3

Double_Joseph t1_iqrrikq wrote

You are looking at perspective. Everyone has different idea. I am talking facts. It is possible to have an area that is perfect for making life thrive. Abundance of water, food, perfect climate. This would be considered a utopia. What are you all not understanding about this?

−2

Searbh t1_iqrucew wrote

A perfect society is not solely achieved by an abundance of resources.

2