Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BowlerAny761 t1_isuzlmx wrote

Unfortunately, it is true.

You think the story of London’s world-changing sewage system is most effectively told through the lens of a guy digging the hole?

The fellow who, despite public opinion being against him, managed to get it done takes a back seat to that? What story are you telling here?

Anyway, you retain the Great Man approach her too.

2

Flymsi t1_isyyytd wrote

>Anyway, you retain the Great Man approach her too.

Please dont lay words in my motuh? I accept it as one of many tools. I say that a nail needs a hammer. But different things need different tools.

​

>You think the story of London’s world-changing sewage system is most effectively told through the lens of a guy digging the hole?

No. I never proposed that. Depending on what you goal is and what you want to tell your lens should vary. So if you want to tell people about innovation and how to deal with limited space/resources then its most effective to tell a problem/solution orientated story. For example it will begin with the Problem, how they perceive that problem, what resources they had, what was tried and what worked. The process of all those decisions is what matters. It really does not matter that one big guy that politically supported it despite public opinion. Such Drama only distracts from the problem solving aspect that the story want to effectivly tell.

On the other hand if you want to educate people about holding on to good ideas, then it is a good way to tell the story like that. Because then the goal changes. The actually process of finding the right solution matters less, because the goal is not one of an engineer but one of an activist.

1