Submitted by BernardJOrtcutt t3_ycc1f1 in philosophy
DprAf t1_iuc9tq9 wrote
hell and morality of the creator
I want to start from the begining. I have heard people say many times that anihilation is better than eternal suffering I am trying to articulate my thoughts and feelings about anihilation. One part of me understands the statement, why anihilation is better than suffering but the other part does not understand it since anihilation is not exisntence, but absence of existence it can not be compared to neither happiness nor suffering. Can anyone present their thoughts about the subject?
HyperConnectedSpace t1_iufxm4q wrote
In annihilation the sum of pain and pleasure is zero, unlike how in eternal suffering pain is more than the pleasure so the sum total is less and therefore worse. Both pain and pleasure could be seen as on the same scale , like how negative and positive numbers are on a number line. The common unit would be utility of the person. Anihilation can be compared to an very painful afterlife because it would have an effect on the total happiness of the dead person, like how zero is on the number line. They can be compared because a person could prefer one to the other naturally. The state of deep sleep gives us someone idea of what annihilation might be like, and although we are always conscious we could experience stopping some of our senses with things like blindfolds. This would allow annihilation to be compared to eternal suffering. If we wish for everyone to be as happy as possible than
annihilation would be perhaps a better option than eternal suffering. I do not believe that eternal suffering would exist after death, instead I think some random mind in the future or past or annihilation would be experienced.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments