Submitted by TuvixWasMurderedR1P t3_yd1jb3 in philosophy
ilolvu t1_ittj2ih wrote
Reply to comment by hugefish1234 in Peter Singer Is the Philosopher of the Status Quo by TuvixWasMurderedR1P
>That being said, giving to charity can be done at the same time as working toward systemic change.
Singer doesn't encourage people to do so. His focus is entirely (or close to it) on charity.
Has he ever gone after a systemic problem with the same vigour as animal cruelty? I don't think so.
ddrcrono t1_itty360 wrote
I think if I were Singer one thing I would be concerned about would be politicizing my philosophy too much. So if he solidly aligns too much with <obviously left-wing party social policy plank> he stands to alienate half or more than half of his readers. From his point of view, it may be better to only advocate for voluntary of your own free will charity and hope that people get the hint on the systemic change side of things. Also, considering this stuff came up in the 70s, there's probably a bit of calculation going on regarding that political climate. (Thatcher and Reagan were just around the corner so maybe that relates)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments