Submitted by ThomasJP1983 t3_yv9nft in philosophy
deportedtwo t1_iwdbuj8 wrote
This is a blog post, not an argument.
It really doesn't amount to much more than "I choose to call this behavior 'liberal.' Therefore, any criticism I levy against that behavior can be levied against anything else I call 'liberal.'"
You'll get more upvotes in /r/conservative than you will anywhere else. This just ain't rigorous thinking. It's really not much more than a well-to-do white dude whining and trying to name drop Popper for legitimacy as is, sorry.
edit: if you can answer the following questions, there might be a discussion in there somewhere:
-
What is your definition of "intolerance"? "Tolerance"?
-
What is your definition of "liberalism"?
-
Explain why you feel justified in claiming that "certain liberal values have achieved hegemony," and why you think that's a bad thing.
HereticGospel t1_iwg6v7b wrote
Did you consider the diagnosis “well-to-do white dude” to be rigorous thinking? Just looks like racism to me. It’s also a bit odd that you’d project that upvotes is the end he seeks in a philosophy sub. That “ain’t” rigorous thinking either. You should do some introspective analysis sometime there Pascal.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments