Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ingvariuss t1_iy41fzu wrote

I've been reading philosophy since I was a child, and I've always imagined how awe-inspiring it would be to converse with philosophers from the past.

Well, advances in deep learning and natural language processing have made this possible in some ways, and I've set a goal for myself to create a small project as proof of concept.

This project is titled "Speaking with Plato - A Deep Learning Approach to Philosophy." Plato is a favorite philosopher of mine, and his philosophy is still very relevant today.

Plato's Theory of Forms can be seen in the field of pattern recognition. Here we see issues when it comes to training AI algorithms that are easy for humans.

When it comes to image pattern recognition, for example, we can easily train a child to recognize a tree. We can also train an AI to perform this task, but it will fail when presented with a fake tree.

The above problem that AI revealed to us was masked by our meaning-making capabilities. Mainly, our embodied brain, which is dynamically coupled with the environment, can render things obvious to us. Therefore, we think that the explanation comes from that obvious.

Two deep-learning models are used in the project. One is a Chatbot that simulates a conversation with Socrates, while the other is more creative and generates text in an attempt to imitate Plato. All of his work is also explored as part of an EDA (Exploratory Data Analysis).

Here's a sneak peek:

User: What is virtue?

Socrates: A thing which is taught by a certain master, and which is rightly taught by him; and he who taught it, and has taught it also, is good in so far as it is taught?

More can be read in this blog: https://dataspiral.blog/speaking-with-plato/

4

tecumbera t1_iy6rgyh wrote

I’m going to go completely off-topic but the idea of conversing with mighty philosophers has always frightened me immensely. I’m not a genius or a published philosopher, I don’t even have a degree in philosophy but even then I have read a fair amount of text and have been seeking to further increase my understanding and interpretation of said texts. That being said, conversing or debating with those kind of philosophers would have left me either awestruck for weeks, completely convinced of whatever they told me or in a worst case scenario, completely hopeless and full of doubts. I would love to converse with those philosophers, some living and others dead but I don’t really know if that would be healthy for me.

Anyways, sorry for hijacking your comment.

3

Ingvariuss t1_iy7zo5k wrote

No worries, thanks for contributing to the comment!

I do share a similar feeling and background to you. For example, I can't imagine needing to speak or debate Hegel. Wittgenstein probably wouldn't even want to talk anymore :D

2