ppetree t1_j0w9xi7 wrote
Despite ones political beliefs or ones love languages, fundamentally there are only two kinds of people:
The first is one who believes its "every man for himself."
The second is one who believes we all have an obligation to "help each other make it to the end."
There is no philosophy beyond recognizing those two types of people.
iiioiia t1_j0ya9mb wrote
Incorrect - some people believe that "help each other make it to the end" is a good idea, but once people start throwing the word obligation around, or speaking in confident false dichotomies, some people get nervous, and I'm one of them.
ppetree t1_j0z9f46 wrote
The word "obligation" was never a part of my comment. That's your distortion.
iiioiia t1_j0zku38 wrote
> The word "obligation" was never a part of my comment. That's your distortion.
"The second is one who believes we all have an obligation to "help each other make it to the end.""
https://i.imgur.com/aJun2k3.png
With every passing day, it is becoming increasingly difficult to believe that this is not a simulation.
ppetree t1_j0zsa9g wrote
I see what the problem is, you're interpreting obligation as work and I'm interpreting it as a moral kindness that comes without effort.
iiioiia t1_j0ztiug wrote
I think you failed to address this:
"The word "obligation" was never a part of my comment. That's your distortion."
Are you willing to address it, or do you refuse?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments