Submitted by simsquatched t3_104kji6 in philosophy
aesu t1_j39j9pk wrote
Reply to comment by who519 in The Persistent Problem of Consciousness: an astronaut's epiphany by simsquatched
How does this apply to any of our ancestors? Beyond some more intelligent and prosocial birds, and prosocial mammals, what possible context could there be to this for most animals? What does this mean for matter which has not been consumed by self replicating carbon chains?
I have not expressed disdain for anything. I'm trying to understand the context of such a mechanism outside of highly developed pro-social animal behavior. And why does the brain even exist, if it can apparently function without itself?
who519 t1_j39myzd wrote
In non-local consciousness theory the brain is a receiver. So without the brain the body would not be able to function any better than a radio with no signal.
Why wouldn't the same consciousness apply to our ancestors, or dogs, or lizards or anything else? Why is the only conscious experience you can conceive that of modern humans? Several different species have shown all kinds of conscious indicators.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments