Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kreiggers t1_j3zpks8 wrote

Reply to comment by pestilenceinspring in How philosophy can help with loving the art but hating the artist by ADefiniteDescription

But there are other people that earn (and some even deserve) the income from art - Kevin Spacey didn’t make a movie on his own, other cast members, etc. same goes for music

14

Ivy_lane_Denizen t1_j419dj7 wrote

Thats unfortunate, but movies and other media projects fail all the time for a plethora of reasons, Im not responsible for helping them succeed in the first place. Additionally most of these other people rarely get paid based on how well the products sold.

1

pestilenceinspring t1_j3zpu1d wrote

Then specifically take his ends and the others can keep theirs. We can create solutions as we think and go. Problem solving should be ever evolving in my opinion.

0

Knale t1_j3zsuqq wrote

How exactly do you recommend pirating media so that only one member of an enormous cast and crew is affected?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean.

7

BlessedBySaintLauren t1_j3ztm9k wrote

I mean if they have an active civil suit against them for payment then the royalties will go to the victims and not the artist.

For example O.J Simpson

5

pestilenceinspring t1_j3ztmkg wrote

It's just a suggestion, take if you will or won't. I mean hell, some people refuse to watch a show with a "tainted" actor, or those programs aren't aired by many channels or streaming platforms, like the cosby show for example. Some people thought it was unfair because the other actors hadn't done anything triffling and they deserved those royalties. But on the one hand, they have other royalties and roles, or they take on other jobs after acting. I'm not saying it's fair, but its hard to work out royalty payments if viewers won't touch a movie or show or whatever with a ten foot pole.

3