Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mirh t1_j45wd8n wrote

> Do we not still use the concept of the id, superego and ego?

No, not even tangentially.

> I just love how everybody has been jumping on the anti-Freud bandwagon for the last 30'40, years it's really laughable.

It's really laughable that it took so long for the cognitive revolution to spread.

> I'm so disappointed in the field that I wanted so to enter. It's obviously now driven by social trends and political party subgroups.

You meant peer-review, reproducibility and statistical rigour, dude. Wtf.

2

AddaleeBlack t1_j45x6zk wrote

wtf is right. Black and white thinking is the curse of this time.

Do they not teach now that Research and Psychology are different than counseling and talk therapy? Different treatments, different environments for treatments... ignorance abounds, per usual. Treatments vs theory and self report "science"?

YMMV and wokism won't heal your mind, tbh.

1

mirh t1_j463ntx wrote

> Do they not teach now that Research and Psychology are different than counseling and talk therapy?

Clinical psychology is and must be based on proper research...

Nobody said that you must tell patients to evaluate their life through a chi-squared test

> Different treatments, different environments for treatments... ignorance abounds, per usual.

That's why you must be accurate.

No goddamn single case studies in a private setting, which.. uh, a single person can fake and call it a day for half a century.

> YMMV and wokism won't heal your mind, tbh.

Wtf^2

3