Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

VoilaVoilaWashington t1_j8jmffr wrote

Again, I think it's all staged - Banksy probably had people report it as unsafe or recruited a city worker, outrage ensues, and now it's going to be put back and the art will be displayed in all its glory.

11

Krynn71 t1_j8k870k wrote

Artwork has been used to draw attention to unsafe things for a long time. He probably painted it and it just made it more obvious and shameful for the city council to ignore. Like how this guy (nicknamed Wanksy) got pot holes fixed by painting dicks on them.

27

PM_ME_SEXIST_OPINION t1_j8krlpk wrote

Hahahahaha "Wanksy"

I'd heard of the action before but the name absolutely tickles me

5

koos_die_doos t1_j8jsvhd wrote

It’s Banksy, it doesn’t need outrage.

6

VoilaVoilaWashington t1_j8jtqxi wrote

I don't know about you, but I've heard of 2 Banksy pieces in the last few years - the one that was shredded and this one.

A random piece painted on a building doesn't make headlines. This did, even if briefly.

3

ShopliftingSobriety t1_j8kygsz wrote

All of his recent works have been headlines on all the UK apps. So yeah, random building painting does - if you're Banksy.

He also recently did pieces in Ukraine that got a ton of international coverage. He definitely doesn't need anything for publicity.

6

cadex t1_j8kcrxu wrote

I can tell you that is not the case. But I'm sure my acquaintance who works for TDC will get a giggle from this theory.

5