Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

t1_iumphhg wrote

Seriously, it's not drones.

264

t1_iumroos wrote

Drones aren’t real?

65

t1_iumtije wrote

Turns out drones are actually organic birds. We've been lied to in both directions

122

t1_iumum3g wrote

I love telling people that my conspiracy theory is that drones aren’t real, and that they’re just birds

52

t1_iun7yox wrote

It’s also not what Whitby abbey looked like.

58

t1_iuomuh2 wrote

Oh damn I had no idea, thanks for pointing that out

Edit: upon looking a little closer it looks like the reconstruction I linked ignores the arches on the walls which makes me skeptical of how accurate it is

46

t1_iuox05l wrote

Any reason UK isn't/hasn't tried reconstruction of it?

3

t1_iup712n wrote

Why would we? You'd ruin it.

15

t1_iuqat6r wrote

Re-ruin it.

Suppose they could tender the job on checkatrade.com

1

t1_iuqv68b wrote

If we wanted to make a statement rebuilding something like this, or create some kind of public works program, places like Rievaulx or lindisfarne would get my vote.

I'd rather Whitbys stayed ruined as it is. Much more on theme I feel.

2

t1_iuq97t1 wrote

It would cost far too much to reconstruct all of the abbeys that have fallen into ruin.

It would destroy the cultural and religious significance that the ruined abbeys highlight.

They’re protected properties and councils/government would have a hard time agreeing on the projects to rebuild.

Most of the UK aren’t catholic so rebuilding abbeys would seem like a huge job for a minority group.

3

t1_iuqdn0q wrote

Heritage site, construction will be extortionate, popular as is for the area and we've got tones of others to care about.

1

t1_iumtehi wrote

maybe virtual drones

4