Submitted by PublicCommenter t3_11x56x9 in pittsburgh
Gnarlsaurus_Sketch t1_jd2z32u wrote
Reply to comment by Bolmac in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
Most of the time, these activists have nothing resembling a workable plan, let alone funding. Their approach to "oversight" is to jam up the process so nothing new ever gets built unless they approve. Which they never do, because they're typical NIMBYs or tankies. People respond much better to complaints when the complainers present a workable solution to the problem they identify.
It blows my mind how resistant some people here are to development, even when Pgh has been badly lagging in this area since the 1980s. We have a declining population and some of the oldest housing stock in the country. Opposing development instead of compromising for smarter, more equitable development is a fool's errand.
ktxhopem3276 t1_jd31hxt wrote
Most of the anti development campaigns are just neighborhood nimbys and sometime worse, landlords astroturfing to reduce competition. Which developments have been blocked by actual housing equity activists?
Big-Naturals69 t1_jd32k5h wrote
Lol take a look at the post history of the dude you’re replying to, I think he has a modest proposal for the housing crisis
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments