Submitted by Jumpy-Natural4868 t3_10peskj in pittsburgh
Jumpy-Natural4868 OP t1_j6kl901 wrote
Reply to comment by DannyLameJokes in BNY Mellon takes unusual step in overhauling its 401(k) plan by Jumpy-Natural4868
Interesting. I think the two-week rule for people in certain sensitive positions with to make sure that you were gone long enough that you weren't doing anything shady because someone else would have to do your position for 2 weeks and could spot shady activity.
Dancing_Hitchhiker t1_j6koi2n wrote
It’s probably pretty rare but I have heard it mentioned before for the same reason you stated.
SecretSquirrelSauce t1_j6l2ej3 wrote
It's common in the security industry. Mandatory job rotations and vacations to ensure exactly what the person you replied to was saying. Someone out for a long time = a change in work flow that can reveal fraud/theft/etc
mmphoto412 t1_j6l62vk wrote
yes thats exactly what it is, and I believe its required by the OCC. However to their point that rule effectively dictates the entire use of your PTO.
Local_Penalty2078 t1_j6mq8gu wrote
In multiple sensitive positions I've been in at multiple institutions, the rule has always been 5 business days.
A full 2 weeks is excessive. Don't get me wrong - 2 weeks off is nice, but when that's pretty much someone's entire stock of time off that's too much.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments