Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

beta_vulgaris t1_j8p7x9j wrote

The city added speed humps to my residential street several years ago and it has made a hugely positive impact on deterring speeding drivers. I am grateful for them.

48

Proof-Variation7005 t1_j8p8fsc wrote

I think, in practice, some of them have been ill-placed or maybe made a teeny bit too high but overall, it's a minor inconvenience.

31

GoGatorsMashedTaters t1_j8p8t0h wrote

Yes, but I think there are better alternatives, including focusing on noise reduction.

Angry drivers are the problem, and until they face consequences for their actions nothing will change.

10

Previous_Floor t1_j8pa1xx wrote

I strongly oppose them. They slow down fire trucks and other emergency vehicles.

−19

vegemouse t1_j8pa9yr wrote

I think every neighborhood benefits from speed bumps, but the ones on Main by the Whole Foods make me feel like I’m about to total my car by going over them at 5mph.

4

Kelruss t1_j8pakbj wrote

Generally, I think they've been somewhat effective, though I know they annoy a lot of drivers. I also notice that for the most dangerous vehicles (large pickups and SUVs with high front heights which make it more likely a pedestrian will be crushed under the wheels rather than falling onto the hood), the speed hump "solution" is fairly ineffective; these vehicles' widths tend to be enough to adequately clear the humps without slowing down much. So, we're effectively slowing the safest vehicles, but still failing to stop the most dangerous ones.

Ideally, we do things like raised crosswalks and planting trees along street edges and doing road diets and then start separating out pedestrian, cycling, and vehicle uses... but I won't hold my breath (I will raise it with the city councilors I know, though).

27

cowperthwaite t1_j8pb8ng wrote

I live off of Messer and I find the the planters on the side of the road to be more enjoyable, as a driver, although sometimes irritating, as people think the road is too narrow when indeed, they have enough room.

Edit: The planters do make me scared to bike down Messer, although there are side streets that don't get as much traffic that I take instead.

29

DiegoForAllNeighbors t1_j8phlbi wrote

They have slowed cars down in our neighborhood for sure. Not everything but it’s part of the solution and bike lanes, and cameras and noise cameras and raised side walks etc etc… feels like lots of small things make the big difference, over time.

3

LunaSolTerra t1_j8pmw4a wrote

My house has been hit twice, and my neighbors house once by cars speeding on a curve and losing control of their vehicle. After they put the bumps on the curve a few years ago, never again

13

Trawetser t1_j8po4c3 wrote

I can straddle the speed humps in my Golf and get through them without slowing down much or really feeling anything more than a slight raise. If a Golf can do it, pretty much any car can, it isn't just the oversized vehicles

1

Human-Mechanic-3818 t1_j8pseu5 wrote

If it was about pedestrian and community safety, they would have put them in the road that runs through chad brown… think about that one.

1

smt674 t1_j8pvt5b wrote

I've had largely the opposite experience, speed bumps on a larger parallel street has caused faster moving traffic on my street. Definitely not a one size fit all for the city.

1

Previous_Floor t1_j8q38a7 wrote

>so, eliminate a traffic calming measure proven to lower average speeds by 18% and replace it with one in a city where we can barely get every corner to be wheelchair accessible. you hit the nail on the head champ.

An unbelievable lack of common sense as well as an unfamiliarity with the area being discussed.

Do you geniuses understand that there's a fire house a block away? And you want to put in speed bumps??

1

Impossible-Heart-540 t1_j8q4yhw wrote

Paolino has complained about them, and Paolino backed Smiley’s campaign. So unless they are overwhelmingly popular I don’t see the mayor jump starting this initiative (though I like them).

4

BernedTendies t1_j8qddwe wrote

Some of them are massive and I personally hate them. But a lot of dipshits in Nissan Altimas carrying a 540 credit score don’t know how to drive and were endangering the rest of us, so I guess they’re better to have

23

Previous_Floor t1_j8qivqu wrote

"Speed bumps can cause a significant delay in the response times of emergency services. It will take emergency vehicles an additional 20 to 30 seconds to get through each speed bump. This time is crucial when dealing with life or death situations."

0

Everythingismeaning t1_j8rijfr wrote

Only Reddit would be in favor of traffic cameras which are inherently racist. The speed bumps do nothing to slow down the truly reckless and most dangerous to the safety of our streets and residents

−7

D-camchow t1_j8rmp18 wrote

I'd love some installed on our street tbh.

5

lightningbolt1987 t1_j8rx1yw wrote

Joe Paolino is poison. He’s so ridiculously out of touch with basic, best-practice, urban planning and yet he is constantly barking at people, and with influence. He needs to go on a sabbatical, visit other successful cities, shit—do a fellowship somewhere, and learn a thing or two. This is not 1991 and we don’t live in Dallas.

5

lightningbolt1987 t1_j8rxkno wrote

Put them everywhere all the time. There’s no downside to cars slowing down in a city.

10

Impossible-Heart-540 t1_j8s2x83 wrote

Be that as it may, he is a major broker here, and has a sizable constituency - so I can see Smiley conceding in some areas like this.

He was Clinton’s ambassador to Malta so he gets out - of course at the time he remarked how proud he was to be at the site of where the allies met during WWII (that was Yalta).

3

lightningbolt1987 t1_j8s3ii5 wrote

I’m just lamenting that he’s a power broker here. Great he lived in Malta in the 90’s. His views on cities in the year 2023 make him look petty, out of touch, and willfully ignorant. You’re right that smiley needs to listen to him, but hopefully Smiley has the wisdom to take what Paolino says with a grain of salt.

3

Impossible-Heart-540 t1_j8s7fv4 wrote

Probably need to make how property values rise arguments to him.

Certainly he’s one who has benefitted enormously from the spending on the rivers and turning them from an asphalt expanse to a pedestrian friendly series of bridges.

OTOH, a tunnel under Kennedy plaza would likely have the same effect as the Rebello tunnel under Six corners in EP - and kill them.

His dad was wiser.🤷🏼‍♂️

1

lightningbolt1987 t1_j8s88i4 wrote

Truth. He doesn’t get that bike lanes and the scooters actually make the city more desirable for young talent and start-up businesses and help his property values. But how on earth DOESN’T he get that? Kendall Square is one hour north. NYC is a short train ride away. Both have gone full blast with pedestrian infrastructure and have the most expensive real estate in the world…

3

Dr-Stink-Stank t1_j8soxol wrote

Support. The amount of self-centered assholes I see absolutely flying down narrow side streets is appalling. They aren’t going to correct their behavior on their own anytime soon and I need to leave the apartment to go to work and shop etc. so this is probably the best solution.

1

sizzle-d-wa t1_j8srdc3 wrote

Couldn't agree more. There soooo much room even for two SUVs. Also, when those went in the city promised to grind the corners down a little bit (so at least folks wouldn't pop theirs tires). Never happened.

2

Previous_Floor t1_j8u83n0 wrote

>That's why the ones in Providence have gaps. They're called speed "humps" or "cushions." The channels allow emergency vehicles to take them at speed.

The OP said "speed bumps". You're talking about something different.

1

sizzle-d-wa t1_j8vzbyg wrote

Um, so you're saying that there is a legitimate problem in Providence with people thinking that they have a right to go 90 mph through a neighborhood filled with schools?

Ah yes, the ole "more cameras = less police" argument. Because no police state ever had tons of cameras all over the place.

3

lightningbolt1987 t1_j8wqubv wrote

Also: he single handedly seems to have killed the Kennedy plaza pavilion project where a world class architect (Merge) was going to design a space for the dune brothers people on Kennedy plaza using federal money! Smiley killed it (“we aren’t doing anything in Kennedy plaza until Superman is finished”—dumb idea) because Paolino was so against it. Paolino doesn’t realize how much that would have helped his buildings’ value there by bringing more people to Kennedy plaza, because he’s a fool.

2

Proclaimer23 t1_j8y4t7r wrote

The only place I’ve seen solid speed bumps that go all the way across the road in Providence is in Elmwood, all of the new ones I’ve seen go up in the past few years (Knight St, Chalkstone, Dexter) are designed with breaks in them so they don’t slow emergency vehicles. Where else are you seeing the full speed bumps in the city?

2

HeWhoIsNotMe t1_j8yf8vm wrote

I'll take a speed bump over a speed camera.

1

DiegoForAllNeighbors t1_j93q57x wrote

There is a problem in my neighborhood with people going 90MPH in residential areas yes.

Point taken about the police state. But I also favor ending the War on Drugs and LEOBOR and several other key criminal justice reforms. I think we can have eclectic points of view. In fact I think most people do and rarely fit into a neat little box. Thanks!

1

meme-scraperr t1_ja39t87 wrote

Hated them at first but now don’t mind them, as long as they’re not the ugly plastic ones

1