Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Cycle-path1 t1_ja0ssud wrote

I still have a hard time considering anything AI as art tbh. The process of feeding AI prompts instead of going through any kind of creative process just doesn't do it for me.

13

Toast119 t1_ja2zq92 wrote

You could make that abstract statement about any type of request made to an artist.

What is the threshold for a "creative process" to you? If an artist doesn't meet that threshold? Etc..

1

Cycle-path1 t1_ja4eahk wrote

The ethical problem about AI generated images is that you feed it images and oftentimes other artists pieces or photographs to achieve the desired style and effect.

It also takes away commissions from artists who actually need the work, now that this is a thing companies will just utilize this software and even possibly steal others art to generate these pieces.

I've already seen a lot of artists pursue legal action against people using their art to generate AI images and it's apparent because their signature is appearing in the AI pieces.

1

412gage t1_ja0sqck wrote

Those birds are... something

5

lonely_dodo t1_ja14ctm wrote

biblically accurate pvd birds just like in roger williams's diary

4

CocaineSlippers t1_ja8jw7z wrote

Why so much hate here for AI generated images? The technology is super cool, easy to use, and ends up spitting out unique and pleasing stuff like this. I have art hung in my home that i generated with AI. Not everything these image generators create is a knockoff you know...

4

proviethrow t1_ja9yqrh wrote

It's artificial, right there in the name. Disliking fake content seems like a sane human opinion. Much like spam and robocalls.

1

proviethrow t1_ja85bmn wrote

Fake content should be moderated.

−2