Submitted by CrassostreaVirginica t3_11ea3x6 in rva
ManBMitt t1_jadnbn7 wrote
Reply to comment by kneel_yung in Richmond Public Schools principals unionize by CrassostreaVirginica
If an employer needs to raise pay in order to attract enough qualified candidates to fill open positions, then they will do that regardless of whether a union is present. If they don’t do that, then that has more to do with the employer’s incompetence than with the employees’ bargaining power.
Realmofthehappygod t1_jadpkec wrote
Right, we need employee's bargaining power to counteract employer's incompetence.
That is the main issue.
STREAMOFCONSCIOUSN3S t1_jaei1if wrote
In this case the employer is the taxpayer. Why haven't the taxpayers of Richmond city voted to raise educators' pay?
kneel_yung t1_jaeot9r wrote
The school board would be the employer.
CadenVanV t1_jaf1sx5 wrote
Because the school board chooses how to allocate funds and the current one is the shittiest institution on earth. The taxpayers have no say over this
Hedgiepotamus t1_jaes9z9 wrote
Bullshit. They pass laws lowering standards and move the goalposts. Ex: Why attract and hire more subs when they can force current teachers to give up planning to watch classes? Planning we need to make lessons and grade and do IEP work and do PDs and and and. This kinda shit is rampant. They aren't incompetent. They are very intentional in not spending the money. Teacher and administrator unions are not the baddies. My union spends half our time advocating for changes that would be of benefit for students mainly. Because teachers and administration give a shit about students and we are often some of the only people catching systemic issues. So it falls on us to advocate for solutions. Your black and white understanding of how the world works is failing you spectacularly.
sirensinger17 t1_jaf3eoe wrote
Ex teacher here. No they won't. They'll just keep the bad teachers instead of hiring better ones. And then decent teachers like me leave cause we know our skills will be better appreciated and better paid elsewhere
kneel_yung t1_jaeggw1 wrote
> If an employer needs to raise pay in order to attract enough qualified candidates to fill open positions, then they will do that regardless of whether a union is present
Unless they can still turn a profit anyway, in which case they absolutely don't have to if they don't want to.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments