Submitted by AlreadyShrugging t3_z8dzxh in rva
Danger-Moose t1_iycrff3 wrote
Reply to comment by 8bitmullet in Regency Wal-Mart, yet another shooting. by AlreadyShrugging
Seemed to work fine.
8bitmullet t1_iycs54m wrote
So does a broken clock twice per day. Of course if we assume the worst about someone and their intentions we'll be right some of the time.
The collateral damage, of course, being that the internet gets shittier and more negative in general as a result.
This one interaction does not change the general rule...getting sufficient evidence before drawing conclusions leads to better decisions.
Far too many people take a hint or a shred and call it sufficient evidence. I am suggesting a higher threshold.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments