Submitted by lunar_unit t3_zi1yco in rva
RCBilldoz t1_izqwqdx wrote
Reply to comment by ImmobilizedbyCheese in Months after closure, Richmond has no future plans yet for Texas Beach Bridge by lunar_unit
Hahahaahaaa. Where did you get that info?
There are offices with enough budge for salary.
ImmobilizedbyCheese t1_izs1px8 wrote
I work with them. They have to fight to get funding.
RCBilldoz t1_izs5m44 wrote
What department doesn’t?
And where did you get that info that they have the lowest operating budget? Just curious.
Edit: Nevermind. A quick search and review found you to be wrong. https://rva.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/FY%202023%20Proposed%20Annual%20Fiscal%20Plan%20-%20FINAL%20%28online%20version%29_0.pdf
ImmobilizedbyCheese t1_izsa5hy wrote
Thanks for the info. I should have said a very low budget for the amount of parks they need to maintain and improve. Apologies for the incorrect statement.
RCBilldoz t1_izsbj39 wrote
They all struggle for funding and you threw out BS for the karma.
Parks budget is also what the city gives them. They does not include revenue from events, or the FJRP donations.
Downvote then apologize? Or apologize then downvote. You realize that’s oxymoronic?
Just try and provide real data. There is a huge resource right at your fingertips.
ImmobilizedbyCheese t1_izsc24i wrote
I didn't downvote and I edited my comment since you were right in pointing out my info was incorrect. All I know is from working with them and their limited budget for projects. I've been told their annual budget is 600k to maintain ALL of the parks. That's just maintenance without the community center improvements which they were lucky to get federal funds to complete. I'm not trying to get karma or be argumentative, just wanted to defend a hard working group of people.
Colt1911-45 t1_izyym5t wrote
Hats off to you for correcting yourself and posting that you were wrong. I don't know why this Redittor is going after you, but I admire people who will admit they are wrong. It is so easy to just ignore a comment and go about your day, but you have integrity. Sure you did not verify your info before you stated anopinion, but it was pretty close to factual. It's not like you are writing for a dang medical journal.
[deleted] t1_izshm5m wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments