Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GivenAllTheFucksSry OP t1_ja0yzgd wrote

The link is to the website for the National Library of Medicine and the study was published in the most recent issue of the journal Antioxidants. What exactly is "dubious" or "low quality" about it? Please explain.

35

[deleted] t1_ja0z5k7 wrote

[deleted]

0

EconomistPunter t1_ja0zcc9 wrote

Yes. I wonder how impact factor can be gamed…

The Scimago impact factor is 1. Know what that suggests?

−2

EconomistPunter t1_ja0z9ta wrote

MDPI?

Just because something is linked in the National Library doesn’t make it non-dubious…

−20