Creative_soja OP t1_jecwr1j wrote
From the article
"Knowledge about the world is stored in our semantic representations (that is, concepts that correspond to our knowledge about and experiences with the world). These semantic representations are structured following a similarity principle, such that the semantic representations of similar concepts are grouped closer together in neural and psychological space, and those of dissimilar concepts are farther apart1. Because stimuli often activate more than one concept, there is always some uncertainty when a person needs to identify which concept to retrieve. This mapping presents an ongoing challenge for those who are averse to uncertainty. One way to reduce this uncertainty is to separate the semantic representations that are activated by the same stimulus as much as possible in representational space. We posited that people structure their semantic representations in ways that satisfy their psychological needs, including the desire to reduce uncertainty. On the basis of classic work in cognitive science2, we hypothesized that to achieve this uncertainty-reduction goal, people who are averse to uncertainty should exhibit separated semantic representations, which would make each representation more easily identifiable."
Layman's language by the editorial team
"People who are averse to uncertainty usually have a strong motivation to mitigate uncertainty. In this work, the authors suggest that this motivation to decrease uncertainty might also affect semantic representations and related neural activity patterns. The reported findings are a fascinating demonstration of how individual differences can fundamentally affect our cognition"
lovethebee_bethebee t1_jecxlu9 wrote
And in plain English?
Creative_soja OP t1_jed0oc5 wrote
It is analogous to discrete vs continuous color spectrum. Discrete spectrum clearly separates all colors, whereas continuous spectrum has gradual transition.
My simplistic understanding is that people who dont like uncertainty tend to remember concepts as discrete as possible to avoid mixing different concepts. This helps them in reducing memory errors in distinguishing different concepts. However, this also reduces their ability to generalize, meaning they fail to see similarities among different concepts.
The study doesn't establish any causality. So, it is unclear whether how you remember information determines a dislike for uncertainty or vice versa.
Larnak1 t1_jed1iib wrote
Would that affect ability or speed of associations?
I could imagine that typical associations occur due to being grouped together and being activated at the same time. Mitigating that in an attempt to reduce uncertainty would then potentially reduce the ability to quickly associate similar concepts with each other.
Creative_soja OP t1_jed22a7 wrote
I think so too but the study doesn't mention that. It would be interesting future research
[deleted] t1_jed0doz wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments