Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ubermeisters t1_jc2fwwh wrote

"purpose of materials" implies intelligent creation, no? what a stupid headline, or at least, lazy journalism.

−13

ChaoticJuju t1_jc2j4s4 wrote

I think it's just a word for properties it's not that deep...

6

ubermeisters t1_jc2wa26 wrote

it's a science article. they should be using appropriate terms, else how am I supposed to respect them anough to believe they have conducted proper science?

you can be fine with clickbait BS titles, that's all on you. doesn't mean that I need to feel or conduct myself similarly.

−6

ChaoticJuju t1_jc2wps2 wrote

Appropriate to the reddit user or their actual intelligent target audience?

u/ubermeisters, "appropriate to the meaning of the terms being used, smartass. Nice attempt."

And who decides that meaning and how it's appropriate? You right? Or is there a secret league of article writers I haven't heard about? You are getting offended over the way you interpreted a word in an article

6

ubermeisters t1_jc2wsay wrote

appropriate to the meaning of the terms being used, smartass. nice attempt.

−4

DFAnton t1_jc35hbg wrote

No, it doesn't. I hope this answer helps.

5

ubermeisters t1_jc3dzrc wrote

answers require questions thanks, And mine was clearly rhetorical...

−4