Comments
badjokemonday t1_jeebg3g wrote
All they present is a simple correlation so they can't say one variable causes the other. This is not a very good study. I have a feeling they looked at a bunch of variables and this one they found was statistically significant so they wrote a paper on it. I would not pay any attention to this finding unless you are researcher and can create a better study to explore this initial findings.
continentalgrip t1_jeekka1 wrote
You have a feeling they found a significant variable? How else would you do it? Are you going to randomize people to eat or not eat green vegetables?
[deleted] t1_jef1jzb wrote
[deleted]
CogitusCreo t1_jeer5sq wrote
"We observed a significant inverse linear relationship between vitamin K intake and depressive symptoms"
AutoModerator t1_jedavar wrote
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
True_Garen OP t1_jeday1w wrote
Background: The relationship between vitamin intake and depression has attracted increasing attention. However, several studies examining such relationship among populations at different age groups have produced inconsistent findings. This study was aimed to investigate the cross-sectional association between vitamin K intake and depressive symptoms in US adults.
Methods: We used the data from a nationally representative sample of 11,687 adults from the 2013 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Vitamin K intake was assessed by the 24-h dietary recall at the first day. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Logistic regression and generalized additive model were used to examine the association between vitamin K intake and depressive symptoms.
Results: The weighted prevalence of depressive symptoms was 10.2% (8.0% in men and 12.0% in women). We observed a significant inverse linear relationship between vitamin K intake and depressive symptoms in models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational status, family poverty income ratio (PIR), home status, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, physical activity, sleep disorders, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. The odds ratios (OR) (95% CI) for the highest compared with the lowest quartile of vitamin K intake was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.89, p-trend < 0.05). The association was similar in subgroups stratified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational status, PIR, home status, BMI, smoking status, physical activity, sleep disorders, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes.
Conclusion: Vitamin K intake was inversely and independently associated with the odds of depressive symptoms in the US adults. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
[deleted] t1_jedkj5h wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jedcmmc wrote
[removed]
Inaka_Nezumi t1_jeer6xw wrote
Dietary recall is a bit of a hit and miss way of assessing intake of a vitamin and is open to biased interpretation. Vitamin K MK-4 is taken up rapidly by the brain, Vitamin K MK-7 found in hard cheeses and Natto products doesn’t cross the blood-brain barrier. So, other studies would need to follow it up with set dose supplemented vitamin K of the same type, to get a more reliable result.
Rozoy t1_jee2q12 wrote
Sorry for being stupid, but I assume the depressive symptoms come because of getting too little vitamin K and not the other way around?