Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

astrangeparrot t1_is4c6dc wrote

This was my first question. Faster charging generates heat quicker and heat is the primary enemy of batteries.

1

Bozzzzzzz t1_is4dx34 wrote

Sounds like a key breakthrough is the nickel foil, which self regulates the temp and reactivity of the battery.

7

astrangeparrot t1_is4fwkj wrote

I am unconvinced by just an article that a few grams of nickel can regulate the temperature generated by 50~ish mWh being shot into a box of 18650s in the space of 10 minutes, but I do hope that I'm wrong.

2

Bozzzzzzz t1_is4g72g wrote

Well I’m not here to convince anyone but it does state that from what I read, as well as saying the nickel foil cools from the inside somehow vs outside, as is the usual approach, so it is fundamentally different at least.

0

astrangeparrot t1_is4gop3 wrote

Oh, certainly. I've grown sadly skeptical of advances in the tech sector when it comes to batteries. The steam engine and internal combustion engines have had slow, steady, measured progress over the years, and batteries... Well... We got electric cars to work, mostly.

In 20 more years we might be there for everyone. That's the dream.

2

40for60 t1_is5r4p9 wrote

I think what they are saying is that this specific system would be used on a vehicle with a smaller battery so the heat would be less of a factor. Maybe something like a delivery vehicle that makes short trips and might sit often. If you never intend on taking the vehicle on a long trip then the larger battery wouldn't be necessary and an unneeded cost.

2

tkenben t1_is6in88 wrote

This. Plus batteries are heavy. Less mass is always better.

2