yoda_jedi_council t1_itvztfw wrote
Reply to comment by Honest_Blueberry5884 in UCI study finds 53 percent jump in e-waste greenhouse gas emissions between 2014, 2020 | Researchers urge extension of electronic devices’ useful life to cut carbon dioxide creation by Exastiken
Well, and planned obsolescence. Devices are not made to last and processes are on purpose making it hard to repair them.
socialcommentary2000 t1_itwbapd wrote
Planned obsolescence is *somewhat...*and I stress somewhat a canard at this point outside of very specific product types.
The MTTF on pretty much all modern computing equipment (and the boards inside of them) is much longer than the horsepower in any given device can keep up with increasing software demands or the consumables that may be attached to using them, like toner cartridge types for printers, for example.
Preventing repair easily by hard coding preventative measures into specific components...or burying components in assemblies to keep them from being serviced easily very much is a problem. Thing is, with both of those, the failure time is often governed by typical component failure, not necessarily the company setting a specific time they want you to go out and have to buy something.
Honest_Blueberry5884 t1_itwuif8 wrote
They actually are made to last. Their batteries are consumable but that’s an easy fix (part of the thing I’m talking, companies pushing new devices over new batteries).
> processes are on purpose making it hard to repair them.
There is some truth to this.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments