Comments
[deleted] t1_ixgmfbs wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgkt56 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg46f9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg19q5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixh3025 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfwu50 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfxf8t wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_ixghm2t wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgtrx2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixha71f wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixhcfqu wrote
[deleted]
ShexyBaish6351 t1_ixfwypd wrote
For those who think this means “horny guys wants sex,” consider for a moment that maybe scientists aren’t as worthless as you think. There’s quite a body of research on what factors influence men and women’s interest in short-term mating opportunities (e.g., one night stands) as opposed to committed, long-term relationships.
Believe it or not, not all men in all situations seek a quick bang. Often, they’d like an actual long-term companion and invest a LOT of time and resources into pursuing that to the exclusion of short-term partners.
What this study says is that regardless of personality characteristics, relationship status, etc., sexual arousal sort of pushes everything else to the side, and even men who tend to be committed and uninterested in a one night stand shift their strategies/interest to short-term mating.
Might you have predicted this? Probably. Were there reason to doubt it? Actually, yes. There were. Men aren’t just straight up f%^#ing machines. They actually have other motivations. But this study clarified the matter.
And that’s what science is - testing hypotheses, even those everyone thinks are obvious, so that evidence actually exists to support ideas.
This is science. That’s how it works.
gameartist3d t1_ixg3zus wrote
I've found a majority of the traffic on this sub has a hard time reading. That being said, this is an important distinction to make.
[deleted] t1_ixg36cx wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg8i0y wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg8s64 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgkvvc wrote
[deleted]
MightyWhiteSoddomite t1_ixic06l wrote
I also interpret this as a higher incidence of unprotected sex.
[deleted] t1_ixjy5qo wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg3kbp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg2ylu wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgtm93 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfs99y wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfone7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfqszn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfpy9w wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg83ex wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfr6h5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfrk9h wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg4jvq wrote
[removed]
OneTimeIDidThatOnce t1_ixfwqxc wrote
I'm guessing this is like a formal proof in mathematics; it solidifies the foundation of a concept.
[deleted] t1_ixfuzb9 wrote
[removed]
Doomed_Redshirt t1_ixh56bn wrote
Ok scientists, now see if being physically attractive makes a woman desirable for sex. We want to know!
[deleted] t1_ixfsbt6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgc0ce wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfrpa0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfyen5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfzxlv wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixft1nn wrote
[removed]
Flowchart83 t1_ixguy5s wrote
So wanting to have sex makes you want to have sex. Never would have put it together. Does being hungry make people want to eat food too?
Island_Shell t1_ixhkecm wrote
Being sexually aroused and desiring intercourse are not the same thing.
Victims of rape can be sexually aroused, and not consent to sex.
AutoModerator t1_ixfohzs wrote
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
tornpentacle t1_ixfp84s wrote
Usually I'd really be ticked off by the snarky rule-breaking comments about how obvious this is. There are good reasons to study things generally considered common sense.
But this...uh, seriously? Seriously? This is pretty explicitly saying x=x
[deleted] t1_ixfpiku wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfotcv wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfpfuz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfq39a wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfr764 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfrqtm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfs2a6 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfs8k7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfsk48 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfvitz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfwphp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfwz9s wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfxg9s wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfyvio wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfza6k wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfzxb1 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixg413z wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgtuqp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgzd0j wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixhas3t wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixheaaj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixhruf8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixjlvxx wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfy4mr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixgo1z0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ixfvpo6 wrote
[removed]
Arcadius274 t1_ixgxg9p wrote
....this study was funded.....and not by the man show in like early 2000s or something....like people who think.......
ShexyBaish6351 t1_ixkh4l5 wrote
This was very likely part of a much larger study, but they had the data to test these hypotheses, so they did. Happens all the time in the social science. You have TONS of data from a big study, so you think about the hypotheses that you could test with the data set you have, so you do that and write up the results to be published.
I find that 99% of people who question scientific funding have literally no idea how any of it works. But that’s people for you.
AdCool2805 t1_ixh8z4s wrote
Isn’t this like, super obvious and self explanatory?
Find_another_whey t1_ixg4vc4 wrote
They got funding for this?
[deleted] t1_ixfq2iv wrote
[removed]