Submitted by Jealous-Pop-8997 t3_z4g1ab in science
beebeereebozo t1_ixviubm wrote
Reply to comment by MonsantoAdvocate in Glyphosate associated with lower birth weights by Jealous-Pop-8997
I've been reading papers like this ever since the original Seralini report, and it has become easy to spot activist research. But then, researchers like that don't care, they are just running headline mills, nothing more.
eng050599 t1_ixw6itw wrote
It's been fascinating and depressing to see how easily charlatans like Seralini, and even worse, the dimwitted duo of Seneff and Samsel, can manipulate the general public, and non-scientists as a whole.
In the case of Seneff, pretty well everyone I've ever interacted with in relation to her papers doesn't realize that all she's been doing for over a decade is data-mining to dream up hypotheses...that she never bothers to test experimentally.
Quite literally, she stops at the first step in the scientific method.
There has been one hilarious thing involving team Seralini, and Seneff was that, while Seneff hasn't bothered to test any of her hypotheses, a group of researchers, including both Antoniou and Mesnage, did test her glyphosate can substitute for glycine hypothesis (Antoniou et al., 2019 Doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4534-3).
To the surprise of no one, the hypothesis was debunked.
[deleted] t1_ixx9qou wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments