Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Agariculture t1_iw3u9qo wrote

I was wondering how a planet could be superconducting; then i realized it was the metal. Nice

66

Casval214 t1_iw3z7os wrote

Glad I wasn’t the only one who at first thought how could an entire planet be super conductive.

17

Quetzalcoatlasaurus t1_iw43ndz wrote

I mean, it's mostly made of metal so it wouldn't be impossible..

3

EVEOpalDragon t1_iw48so9 wrote

At its temperature? I think that would warrant further Investigation.

3

Quetzalcoatlasaurus t1_iw493i4 wrote

Oh, absolutely. If mercury were a superconductor, we would probably know by now with all the tests we've done. It almost certainly isn't, but a planet sized superconductor would be really interesting

4

orangutanDOTorg t1_iw7p90r wrote

It was actually the 111 years later part that I thought was odd until I figured it out - I was like how did they know the planet was a super conductor way back then?

1

justhereforass2 t1_iw44h5j wrote

Was hoping for a brief summary in the title after the bold claim

7

antiquemule t1_iw4hx3j wrote

They did new, more refined theoretical calculations that fit experimental data.

6

pexx421 t1_iw5tyd2 wrote

It was used in the engines of the vimana, apparently, so we surely have yet to unlock its gravity defying secrets.

4

Fleironymus t1_iw6mflj wrote

I did, but it was boring and dumb so I threw away all the proof.

1

PluCKy-Voco t1_iw5x0sk wrote

What wonders will the adeptus mechanicus gift us with next?? All glory to the emperor!!!

3

AutoModerator t1_iw3qqmz wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

x1uo3yd t1_iwcg71v wrote

TL;DR - Mercury has long been considered a "conventional superconductor" due to having Cooper pair interactions, etc. but the basic DFT models that usually predict critical-temperature for those kinds of superconductors have trouble making good predictions for Mercury. Now, using more complex modern DFT models, they're able to get a critical-temperature prediction from the theory that matches reality to within 2.5%, as well as pinpoint which aspects of Mercury throw-off the basic stripped-down models.

1