[deleted] t1_j20jaa8 wrote
[removed]
0ba78683-dbdd-4a31-a t1_j20jvb9 wrote
Sure, but if you're going to abandon research because you reckon you already know the answer then you may have misunderstood the purpose of science.
[deleted] t1_j20lz9i wrote
[removed]
0ba78683-dbdd-4a31-a t1_j20m3ah wrote
If the results can't be reproduced then can they be trusted?
Sarcomere_stevey t1_j20stjq wrote
I mean the tittle is “new research” that is a bit misleading then
0ba78683-dbdd-4a31-a t1_j20t1tp wrote
Fair, it should probably say "New research supports/corroborates/whatever..."
[deleted] t1_j20mlr5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j20reh9 wrote
[removed]
Murkus t1_j20t6u6 wrote
Don't try apologise for psypost trying to make a clickbaity headlines out of anything they can find their hands on though..
[deleted] t1_j20yvjf wrote
[removed]
Murkus t1_j20t43r wrote
Psypost. Known for terrible 'science,' reporting. Best you keep an eye out for them.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments