Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

eliteLord77 t1_iyq98so wrote

everything in the oceans is vulnerable to noise,.... we have royally screwed up the oceans. horrendous tragedy, over exploited for 500+ years. its a miracle theres anything alive in the oceans at all.

109

showMEthatBholePLZ t1_iyr74yj wrote

Was it really that exploited 100 years ago? Genuinely asking as I thought the industrial revolution was when humanity started destroying the planet.

10

Veasna1 t1_iyra1yb wrote

Whales were for lampoil. But other than that, not sure.

17

DHF_Bassist t1_iyrit8n wrote

Whales were used for other things such as corsets (ribbing from baleen), tools (spoons for caviar), jewlery, soaps, food and perfumes among other things. Absolutely tragic.

12

eliteLord77 t1_iyreqj1 wrote

do some research into historical fish stocks. the seas were seething with fish and whales.

7

marketrent OP t1_iyq60x7 wrote

Tim Stephens, 8 July 2022.

Excerpt:

>The reaction of narwhals to the loud noise from seismic air guns used in oil exploration involves a disruption of the normal physiological response to intense exercise as the animals try to escape the noise. The overall effect is a large increase in the energetic cost of diving while a paradoxically reduced heart rate alters the circulation of blood and oxygen.

>“They’re swimming as hard as they can to get away, and yet their heart rate is not increasing—we think because of a fear response. This affects how much blood and oxygen can circulate, and that’s going to be problematic,” said Terrie Williams, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at UC Santa Cruz who led the new study.

>Published July 8 in the Journal of Functional Ecology, the study provides the first look at the impact of seismic noise on the physiological responses of a deep-diving cetacean.

> 

>According to Williams, the combination of extremely low heart rates, increased heart rate variability, and high-intensity exercise during deep dives presents a significant physiological challenge for narwhals, especially if the disruptions are prolonged as would be likely during extended oil exploration activities.

>Narwhals live year-round in high Arctic waters where sea ice has helped isolate them from disturbance by humans for millions of years.

>But declines in polar sea ice are making the region more accessible to shipping, natural resource exploration, and other human activities.

Journal of Functional Ecology, 2022. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.14119

40

Shaggy_One t1_iyqn0v8 wrote

All I can think of is that one video explaining just how absurdly loud sonar is. Like 200db+ on the high end iirc. Enough energy to instantly boil water surrounding the sonar device if turned up too high.

39

Ichthyologist t1_iyqw6yz wrote

I used to clean boat hulls as a side gig. One day I was getting started on a coast guard cutter and they'd forgotten to turn off the passive sonar. That thing clicked and I could feel it in my skeleton. I can't imagine what the active sonar is like for an animal evolved to hear under water.

33

mostly_kittens t1_iyrhexh wrote

Passive sonar doesn’t generate any noise.

16

Ichthyologist t1_iysatsr wrote

Ah, my mistake. That makes sense. Maybe he said their low gain sonar or something to that effect. I'm going by what I felt and what I remember the seaman telling me six years ago. I'm a biologist, not a sailor.

3

Coppastona t1_iyrg9uq wrote

This is true, most large vessels (at least naval vessels) have ramp-up procedures on their sonar to mitigate this as much as possible.

2

Politikr t1_iyrnv6t wrote

No kidding, it's been known for a long time. Whales and porpoises beach themselves because of sonar all the time.

12

FoxFourTwo t1_iyrp4la wrote

Guess they need to start baconing at a different time. There's still people out at midnight.

3

Zeduca t1_iytdqzt wrote

So are all marine mammals.

3

gourdistheword t1_iysv1jv wrote

What a curious coincidence, just two days ago I did a Cambridge English test, and one of the texts in the reading part was about this bioacustician, Bernie Krause, and his book about acoustics and ecology. Very interesting subject.

2

VdomanFla t1_iyt5jgc wrote

I’ve swam with dolphins, sharks, even whale sharks… but I don’t think I’d swim with a narwhal. That tusk looks too dangerous.

2

AutoModerator t1_iyq5rgh wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Kent_Knifen t1_iyrkz6a wrote

Narwhals Narwhals

Swimming in the ocean

Victims of commotion

And it's not so awesome

2

jnickk t1_iytk12s wrote

Here’s my bi-monthly reminder that narwhals are a real animal.

1

Slimmzli t1_iytuh8i wrote

Sonar frequencies and melt your Brain or boil a little part of the sea

1

serestar t1_iyrewfg wrote

Human activities makes it sound like people splashing in the water. Title should read oil drilling and boat traffic...

0

anthonyofyork t1_iywch32 wrote

This is true of many categories of marine life and I fear, not very well understood by modern society. And this problem will grow worse over time, given the extensive use of sonar in applications ranging from fisheries to warships.

0

Abestisus t1_iyrdrvv wrote

Isn't every being on the planet, including humans, vulnerable to human activities?

If you know of one that is not I would like to know as well so I can change my opinion please.

−3

eliteLord77 t1_iyrgfsb wrote

im not sure what your point is. but, yes, we live in a closed system.

4

Abestisus t1_iyrgy9d wrote

I'm sure you can get the point of it, and thank you for the answer. I love you

0

eliteLord77 t1_iyrhnf8 wrote

no, i don't get your point. to my reading a question like that makes it sound like you think people shouldn't bother

2

Abestisus t1_iyrjmq1 wrote

I mean to say we are a bother to the beings, including humans, of this planet. The research like this will only continue to show more accurately how we are not benefiting the ecosystem. I encourage it

Humans add nothing useful to the ecosystem that the planet couldn't do on its own.

I don't mean for this to be taken as hatred for humans, I love humans but we are a consuming species. We don't put anything back yet.

−1

Beaneroo t1_iyrl64g wrote

Good thing that narwhals don’t exist and are from a fantasyland

−6