Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JSmith666 t1_j2u4txu wrote

So the ends justify the means? Force decent hardworking people to pay more in taxes so others can get a handout? Just to check a box of lower homelessness?

Give people healthcare they don't deserve at the expense of taxpayers just to check a box? We can also spend less by reducing regulation...stop programs like medicare/medicaid and stop forcing ER to treat people who admit they have no intention of paying their bills.

​

Giving bad actors handouts isnt a better result. It rewards greed, selfishness and failure.

−5

Formal-Cow-9996 t1_j2xng25 wrote

Talking to you is useless, you can't read. The dude just said taxpayers spend less for more effective welfare that helps them as well, and you're talking about forcing taxpayers to spend more

3

JSmith666 t1_j2xtaps wrote

Or you can spend even less and have no welfare. They are ways to spend less witnout the negatives of welfare programs existing. He made the argument "we waste money still just more efficiently " people use that argument but wont look at..."what if we eliminate welfare all together"

−1