Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

tornpentacle t1_j2zmgca wrote

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq3903

Here's the actual paper, because...Vice, seriously?

84

marketrent OP t1_j2zo66t wrote

>tornpentacle

>Here's the actual paper, because...Vice, seriously?

Linked content from Motherboard/Vice includes remarks from a call with co-author Daniel Brandenburg.

For example, in my excerpt comment:

>“There's never been any measurement in the past of interference between distinguishable particles,” said Daniel Brandenburg, a physics professor at the Ohio State University who co-authored the new study, in a call with Motherboard. “That's the discovery; the application is that we get to use it to do some nuclear physics.”

33

xDared t1_j30tw4g wrote

There’s nothing wrong with this article though, even if they post some cringey work

16

helm t1_j318ol1 wrote

999/1000 of physics abstracts are impenetrable to the lay public, for a reason. To understand them, you usually need a master's degree in physics. The relevant field of physics.

16