Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Evening_Team t1_j3acfge wrote

There is little basis for any overt spoken threats of personal harm within a society, even when asserting self-defense. The right to self-defense should be presumed at all times and thus need not be asserted in speech as a type of overt threat. Overt threats, such as brandishing a firearm, are also subject to prosecution under a pertinent statute.

1

EasternShade t1_j3ad4oq wrote

Yep. Some speech is recognized as hurtful and subsequently regulated.

1