The accusation that supporters of Universal Basic Income and automation are "lazy" is misguided and lacks a nuanced understanding of the modern economy and work culture. Many jobs today lack fulfillment or meaning, as evidenced by anthropologist David Graeber's work on "Bullshit Jobs." These jobs often involve menial tasks, bureaucratic paperwork, or other activities that do not provide any real value to society. In such cases, working hard may not contribute to the greater good.

It's important to recognize that work is not inherently valuable, and that the value of work is not solely determined by the level of effort or physical labor involved. In the case of a person who automates their job but spends their free time landscaping their property, it would be misguided to label them as lazy simply because they have eliminated the need for their own labor in one area of their life.

The notion of a "puritanical work ethic" has created an unhealthy and false perception of work and society. Hard work is often viewed as inherently valuable, but this ignores the fact that many people work hard at jobs they do not enjoy, just to make ends meet. Moreover, this view can lead to exploitation and overwork, especially when employees have little power to negotiate better working conditions.

Automation and AI present an opportunity to free people from work that is tedious, dangerous, or unsatisfying. Supporters of UBI and AI see this as an opportunity to create a more equitable society where everyone has access to the basic necessities of life. By providing a universal basic income, individuals will be able to pursue work that is fulfilling, rather than being forced to take whatever job is available simply to survive.

It's worth noting the hypocrisy of society's attitude towards work, especially when we consider the disparity between successful video game streamers and single mothers working multiple jobs just to get by. Streamers are often celebrated for making a living playing video games, yet it was not long ago that video games were viewed as a lazy and parasitical use of time. Meanwhile, single mothers, who are often underpaid and undervalued, work tirelessly to provide for their families. The unequal treatment of these two groups is evidence of the distorted perception of work in our society.

A common criticism of Universal Basic Income (UBI) is that it will encourage laziness and that some people will simply sit around all day doing nothing. However, it's worth asking whether this is really a problem, especially in a world of post-scarcity where resources are abundant. If someone is not harming anyone and is able to live a comfortable life without working, why should it matter if they choose to sit around all day? The reality is that most people eventually get bored of doing nothing and seek fulfillment in their lives, whether through work, hobbies, or other pursuits. Moreover, it's important to recognize that fulfillment in work may not always result in a paycheck. Many people find fulfillment in volunteer work, creative pursuits, or simply spending time with loved ones. The value of work should not be solely determined by its economic output, but also by the personal fulfillment it provides. Ultimately, we should aim to create a society where individuals have the freedom to pursue their passions and find fulfillment, without being forced to work simply to survive.