[deleted] t1_j94ku9e wrote on February 19, 2023 at 4:47 AM

Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Do you think the military has a souped-up version of chatGPT or are they scrambling to invent one? by Timely_Hedgehog

[deleted]

SoylentRox t1_j94lra8 wrote on February 19, 2023 at 4:55 AM

>But we can agree to disagree.

You're wrong. Your whole argument is "they could have somehow kept thousands of people working on this in secret". Sure, and they could have secret antigravity research.

Publicly the DoD says they are far behind and need more money. And there is zero evidence for your theory.

[deleted] t1_j94nqzd wrote on February 19, 2023 at 5:15 AM

[deleted]

SoylentRox t1_j94p4em wrote on February 19, 2023 at 5:30 AM

to have +10 years of technology would take thousands of people.

[deleted] t1_j94prao wrote on February 19, 2023 at 5:36 AM

[deleted]

SoylentRox t1_j94pupb wrote on February 19, 2023 at 5:37 AM

Dude you can go look at deepmind papers and count names. Or try to write the smallest change to current SoTA AI code. A few geniuses will not cut it.

SgathTriallair t1_j94oyi3 wrote on February 19, 2023 at 5:28 AM

He's obviously a conspiracy theorist, so I'm not sure logic will work. I'm sure he'll start talking about HARP soon.

SoylentRox t1_j94pgdt wrote on February 19, 2023 at 5:33 AM

Right. And the issue with their position is that while it's possible for the government to have amazing things that are a secret, in reality most of the few secrets they did create leaked all over the place. For example the F-117 - tons of mentions in the press long before unveiling.

It's telling there are no mentions of anything indicating an AGI.