Submitted by Snipgan t3_114i58b in singularity
Snipgan OP t1_j8wdkv1 wrote
Reply to comment by ChronoPsyche in Is chatGPT actually an AI? by Snipgan
I did look up the meaning at different places and I get varied results. IBM makes it sound like this is a "weak" AI, but then I get responses to me claiming it such as wrong.
While others say if it just passes the Turing test. While others say predictive algorithms aren't really intelligent and don't constitute an AI.
I guess it comes down to what is the "intelligence part" and if predictive algorithms fit into that. What is the threshold.
So, I figured I get a consensus on what people think if it is.
ChronoPsyche t1_j8x3q6t wrote
You are definitely overthinking this. The fact that it is divided into "weak ai" and "strong ai" just proves my point that AI is a catch-all term. The chess app on your phone is AI. So are large language models. So is stable diffusion. So is the boss in your video game.
Any algorithm or software that can make any level of decision on its own based on a given input is AI, no matter how useful or limited it may be. You're crowdsourcing opinion from people who don't know what they're talking about, so that's not really useful.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments