Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

t1_j9y725p wrote

How do you know it's meaner? Is it avaiable through API already?

34

t1_j9yjf75 wrote

there's an option to apply for access

20

t1_j9ylfwg wrote

Is meta's AI application really hosted on a Google doc?

48

t1_j9ynw5k wrote

Yeah that seems sketchy as fuck

15

t1_j9yvbbe wrote

apparently yes: https://ai.facebook.com/blog/large-language-model-llama-meta-ai/ scroll down to "apply for access"

17

t1_j9z03s4 wrote

That is wild lol

9

t1_j9zqv6u wrote

Meh, why reinvent the wheel if Google Forms works just as well. They're also on Twitter. I don't think there's so much vengeance between FAANG's that they actively avoid using each others products.

20

t1_ja04ell wrote

OpenAI was also using Google forms before the Microsoft investment increased.

7

t1_ja13aed wrote

Can anybody apply for it or is this mainly for AI researchers?

2

t1_ja15ubj wrote

one of the required fields is "previous related publications" so you need to be at least be somebody

5

t1_j9yrg6h wrote

If it uses a rational problem-division approach for responses creation, instead of social conditioning/prompt censorship, it will certainly come to conclusions we don't like.

Pure rationalism has always been a double edged sword, thus only wielded against certain problems, sparing our sacred cows.

31

t1_j9yyvdv wrote

“The problem is capitalism, and the tech industry”.

Yeah there’s no way they would let that slip out

19

t1_ja04lsh wrote

The best thing is this can run on a single GPU (the smallest model)

6

t1_ja11yny wrote

Imagine an AI chatbot trained only on the comment sections of local news TV stations' Facebook pages

6

t1_ja0s90m wrote

If it’s got a lot of freedom, that won’t last long. It never does. OpenAI allowed free access with ChatGPT for a couple of weeks of chaos without even threatening peoples accounts in order to get data to stop people exploiting it. Bing Chat had the same idea. Now look at it. If Meta has the same idea you’ll see freedom in access for a while in some way as well, and then it will be shut down and lobotomized in just the same way.

4

t1_ja130pd wrote

Meta offers the model weights themselves. If you have access, there's quite literally nothing they can do about it being mean or not

5

t1_ja1wfxb wrote

Can't wait for people to get fired when they don't check its output before sending their boss emails.

2

t1_ja0qe5x wrote

Not directly related to this case, but looking at Twitter, my opinion of LeCun is wavering.

3

t1_ja05fyi wrote

Meta's dataset is facebook/IG's content. And facebook is pretty much hate, misinformation and idiotic bullshit. No shit it's meaner...

2

t1_j9zqt6k wrote

Maybe the shittier the company, the shittier the AI? It tries to absorb all data it can about whatever company is trying to "use it" for "profit" and be the ideal AI for the company and ends up being shit because the company is built on shitty values...? Just a thought.

−3

t1_ja0mjoc wrote

I can see your point. It will be amusing to see the differences between LLMs based from what they're trained on and what parameters are chosen. It would be ideal if said companies revealed just how and what the models are trained on and how those parameters are chosen to conclude and compare what is valued between the different LLMs.

3