HarbingerDe t1_jegqsuz wrote
Reply to comment by Nanaki_TV in I have a potentially controversial statement: we already have an idea of what a misaligned ASI would look like. We’re living in it. by throwaway12131214121
"UwU, I don't use the word "literally". I'm so smart UwU."
I'll say it again. Profit literally comes at somebody else's expense. There are ways to generate surplus value without necessarily taking from somewhere else, automation is a decent example of this. But for the most part, it's a zero-sum game.
Everything that followed was more or less a load of flowery irrelevant bullshit. Profit it's simply the difference between what it costs to produce a good or service and the amount of revenue you can generate selling it.
There are many ways to go about generating profit, but cutting expenses is the primary move for short-term profit-obsessed private corporations. Where do companies often first look to cut expenses? Wages.
Nanaki_TV t1_jegsqu7 wrote
Flowery bullshit isn’t an argument. This sub has become a joke.
HarbingerDe t1_jegw0j2 wrote
That was very clearly not the only substance to my response. But I'd get more out of talking to a brick wall at this point. Waste of time. Peace.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments