Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SharpCartographer831 t1_jeg2w0h wrote

If we're only a few years away? Some suggesting 18 months away, then it stands to reason, Google and multiple other labs have crossed the finish line and waiting to inform the public. Possibly also due to government intervention, which could also explain a few things about Google, going dark.

3

AdditionalPizza OP t1_jeg3qc0 wrote

In the same eerie vein as my thinking, friend. Releasing Bard to take prying eyes away maybe.

1

1loosegoos t1_jegb8tc wrote

I think this is case of you believe your own strawman argument. The release of Bard has been nothing short of disastrous to Googles reputation, not to mention the hit it took in the stock market. Occam's Razor suggests they are simply way behind openai's chatgpt.

1

AdditionalPizza OP t1_jegcex4 wrote

Either you don't know what a straw man is, or I'm really failing to see where I made the case for one because I'm not proposing any kind or argument with anyone specifically...

Example:

Person A: "Animal testing for cosmetics should be banned."

Person B: "You must be against medical research since many medical advancements come from animal testing."

___

But the point is we know Google has a better model than the version of LaMDA used, so why base Bard on it in the first place?

1

greatdrams23 t1_jegcwjn wrote

No. Companies know that winner takes all. Google, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter. If you let your rivals catch up, you lose. Forever.

1

AdditionalPizza OP t1_jegdkmk wrote

That speaks to why it's so unusual for Google to release Bard in the state it is.

1