"The number of AI papers on arXiv per month grows exponentially with doubling rate of 24 months."Quealdlor t1_ir9cz4o wrote
Reply to comment by TheAnonFeels in "The number of AI papers on arXiv per month grows exponentially with doubling rate of 24 months." by Smoke-away
AI works are getting better and better, I can see that. Still the vast majority are bad. The one you linked is good. I often see arms, hands being painted in a wrong way. I still think that it will take multiple years before AI is as good as the best artists. Stable Diffusion should be called Unreliable Diffusion or Unsteady Diffusion for now, judging by all the works I've seen and done.
TheAnonFeels t1_ira0ks4 wrote
Even the fact it can produce quality, discredits all the bad works it produces. Rejecting the bad ones is simple enough, even if humans have to do it...
I don't see how it has an error rate is a problem?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments