Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

superluminary t1_ivo8ofd wrote

Still not entirely sure what’s actually been built here. Sounds interesting though.

50

aperrien t1_ivprek8 wrote

Very interesting. Here is the paper for this.

17

superluminary t1_ivqfvmv wrote

Would be nice if we could just link to the paper, rather than interesting engineering dot com.

7

aperrien t1_ivqpfov wrote

The paper is for the specialists but the articles are easier for laypersons to understand.

7

mathtech t1_ivqzia4 wrote

These mofos are creating dr. Manhattan

6

te_anau t1_ivrsdj3 wrote

I'll take 2 pounds, and some of that, ughh, what is that, guac?

2

tikkymykk t1_ivoxmzg wrote

If this tech is just now coming into public eye, means that the govt has already built a prototype, tested it, and is actively using it.

−17

FrogTrainer t1_ivp8gow wrote

/r/conspiracy is that way ----->

25

Shelfrock77 t1_ivpe1j4 wrote

This whole sub is a conspiracy to 90% of the world. Chill out. Anything is possible.

−7

TheStargunner t1_ivsn6x5 wrote

There’s a difference between technology and conspiracy

3

whenhaveiever t1_ivqpl7v wrote

I'd love to have a government that competent.

9

tikkymykk t1_ivqtu6i wrote

If the us govt can bomb other countries and start wars for economic gains then im pretty sure they got top secret stuff way ahead of mainstream science. Also bob lazar seems convincing enough.

Everyone downvoting me simply lacks imagination.

6

surviveingitallagain t1_ivshba3 wrote

There was a leak of satellite pictures not long ago and they were in much higher resolution than anyone could do with "current" technology so they definitely still have their secrets.

3

ElMikolArisen t1_ivsbyjj wrote

Look into the many articles showing Bob to be an inconsistent liar with direct quotes and clips. As fun as his story is, he's probably just a conman.

0

tikkymykk t1_ivsgvwl wrote

Link one.

2

ElMikolArisen t1_ivshtig wrote

1

whenhaveiever t1_iweikls wrote

Haven't read the whole thing yet, but I like this.

UFO/UAP people talk about the "five observables," which they tend to interpret as technology that lets solid objects do things solid objects usually can't, but I think the more straightforward interpretation is that UAPs aren't solid. I was thinking some kind of laser tech, and a proton beam isn't that far off.

2

tikkymykk t1_ivslqde wrote

The whole article takes lazar's hypothetical, and debunks it with another hypothetical.

1

ElMikolArisen t1_ivsmvh3 wrote

I disagree, there's plenty evidence (and many links) debunking specific claims made by Lazar.

I think you made up your mind too fast. Evidence is never enough to convince a Believer.

2

tikkymykk t1_ivsojbw wrote

Damn so he made it up. Gave it another chance by researching thoroughly myself. Found direct evidence.

I guess you were right about lazar. Wrong about me.

2